Nomination Committees and Corporate Governance: Lessons from Sweden and the UK


The board of director nomination-process is a particularly important but largely ignored aspect of corporate governance. It has been ignored in relation to the attention that has been paid to other corporate governance committees, such as the remuneration and audit committees. Both of these appear to have greater relevance to the financial performance of firms and the correction of managerial failure. EU legislation has addressed both areas.

This paper suggests that, on the contrary, the nomination committee (NC) should be a primary focus of attention in corporate governance debates. As custodians of the corporate purpose and firm values, the board plays a critical role in establishing the objectives of the firm and overseeing their implementation through the formulation of strategy, measurement of performance and setting of standards and incentives. The identification of the right members of the board is therefore a primary influence on the operation of the firm. Thus, the legitimacy of the NC in the eyes of the shareholder community and the trust received from minority shareholders is pivotal to the empowerment of the board.

In particular, the NC is critical to concerns about the ownership of companies and the engagement of institutional investors in active oversight and monitoring of management. It will be suggested that the NC can be instrumental in both promoting the type of large, long-term shareholdings that are a prerequisite to effective engagement by institutional investors and a means by which that engagement is exercised. Furthermore they provide a basis for resolving potential conflicts that arise between different shareholders, most notably between dominant and minority shareholders.

The paper will do this by contrasting the operation of NCs in two countries: Sweden and the UK. Both countries embody what is termed “shareholder primacy”, namely legal, regulatory and institutional structures that privilege shareholders over the interests of other parties, and both countries have a substantial presence of institutional investors as well as national pension funds. They are in the forefront of Europe’s most liberalized and active market economies, based predominantly on self-regulation as against legal statute. They therefore stand in contrast to several other Continental European countries and many other parts of the rest of the world where shareholder interests receive less prominence in relation to that of other parties to the firm. They are in this respect similar to other common law countries, such as the US, and the analysis reported here has relevance to them too.

While therefore similar in many respects, the nature of the two countries’ NCs are very different. In the UK, the NC is an internal committee of the board on which independent members sit and nominate successor members of the board. In Sweden it is an external committee in which shareholders play an important role in the selection process. The internal system of the UK delegates the nomination of new members of the board to its non-executive members. In Sweden, on the other hand, the nomination process resides with representatives of shareholders themselves.

As will be described in the paper, in general Swedish companies have large controlling shareholders who have incentives to exert significant influence over the nomination process. Consequently, by giving them a presence on the NC, its nomination process encourages their direct engagement in the appointment process and mitigates the shareholder disengagement problems that afflict the UK internal system. On the other hand, it does this at the expense of creating another problem, namely potential divergences of interests between different types of shareholders, notably between large, well-informed and small, uninformed, shareholders.

As we will see, differences in the nature of ownership and norms of governance explain much of the difference in operation of NCs in the two countries. Understanding the way in which NCs operate in Sweden and the UK is therefore fundamental to an appreciation of the merits and deficiencies of different forms of capitalism as reflected in their ownership and governance of firms. Growing societal pressure on institutional investors to undertake engaged responsible corporate governance (as proposed by, for example, the Kay Review, 2012 and the EU Shareholders’ Rights Directive, 2014/17) strengthens expectations about the role of NCs in corporate governance (the UK Stewardship Code, 2012; Lipton, World Economic Forum, 2016). This paper asks the questions whether the UK system would benefit from having more engagement by institutional investors in the nomination process and an external rather than an internal NC and would Sweden be advised to reduce the power of dominant shareholders in the nomination process and create a greater level of independence of NCs from large shareholders?

To address these questions, we examine how the institutional corporate governance settings of Sweden and the UK work to empower institutional investors through the NC. The paper draws on a mixture of academic research, legal documents and official as well as semiofficial reports. These sources show how ownership has evolved since the 1980s until now and the relevance of company law in defining the role of independent directors.

The paper draws on novel research showing how Swedish institutional investors have begun to take larger stakes in investee companies that are evaluated over longer time horizons than was previously the case. In the process, institutional investors engage in the NC on a longer-term basis, collaborating both with controlling shareholders and other long-term institutional investors.

As shown in the paper there are advantages and disadvantages in both systems. One the one hand the UK procedure keeps the nomination process independent of any particular shareholding group and promotes the fair treatment of all shareholders. As a drawback, the British ownership market is highly dispersed and thus opens for a serious free rider problem that has given rise to the phenomenon of the “ownerless corporation” in which no investor plays an active governance role. In Sweden, an external nomination committee provides a forum in which the contrasting views of dominant shareholders about the composition of boards can be resolved. At the same time the Swedish system offers inevitable and unavoidable privileging of those present on the nomination committee.

The paper concludes with a discussion of the possibility of achieving superior outcomes by combining features of the Swedish and UK nomination process. For example, some of the board positions could be nominated by external and other by internal committees. Alternatively, all appointments could be by internal committee as in the UK but with some external shareholder representation and, within both models, collaboration between external and internal parties can be encouraged to ensure the nomination of a cohesive team of directors. A flexible application of internal and external nomination committees may help to address many of the issues associated with free-riding and conflicts of interests in corporate governance while promoting sustainable wealth creation in the interest of the company and its shareholders as a whole.


While corporate boards, audit committees and remuneration committees have been subject to extensive analysis and research, one of the most important elements of corporate governance has been largely disregarded: the nomination committee.

This paper suggests that the nomination committee (NC) should be a primary focus of attention in corporate governance debates. The reason is that, if companies make the right initial appointments of board of directors then much else follows; if they do not then no other aspect of corporate governance – monitoring, measurement or incentives – can fully rectify the damage. Thus, the legitimacy of the NC in the eyes of the shareholder community and the trust received from minority shareholders is pivotal to the empowerment of the board. This is especially true in the context of institutional investors.

The paper draws on examples from the UK and Swedish model of the nomination committee. Whereas UK has an internal committee and a mainly dispersed shareholder base; Sweden by contrast, has an external committee and a block-holder governance regime. The article elaborates on the differences and their implication for the efficacy of the NC.

Arguing that there appears to be merits, but also critique, of both systems, the article ends reasoning that the way forward might be to combine elements of them. For example, some of the board positions could be nominated by external and other by internal committees. Alternatively, all appointments could be by internal committee as in the UK but with some external shareholder representation and, within both models, collaboration between external and internal parties can be encouraged to ensure the nomination of a cohesive team of directors.

1 comment
  1. so how climate change allows for all new refugees

    this kind of mission is in partnership with Magnum scans

    after x-mas event on the inside 2008, A trim thread behind ocean island destinations braced relating to inadequate climes. as they are standing inside the Marshall countries, season formulations just had begun months forward. bins rife with cuisine seemed to be wrapped up in anticipation of the gatherings prepared for an additional day. families regarded result in a full night remaining before a day jam-packed with songs combined with the party.

    nevertheless, the overnight floods had become more frustrating as opposed to what thought likely. a child being attentive of Santa sleigh alarms woke up upcoming daily to determine any presents flying in the water.

    the MSRP was the third thunderstorm to hit the country when it comes to two weeks. An offseason attack of this enormity could possibly be a hello pattern in support of people hitting the lake of the beaches of the Hawaiian islands, then again for the reason that hills rippled estimated 3,000 ranges southwest using the pacific ocean, difficulties had taken an upsetting modify.

    Laura Laurum has developed your bikini Atoll on the inside Marshall islands before the region was removed in 1946 When nation put to use a marines job of the islands to carry out greater than 67 atomic blast exams.

    The years are actually don’t the potency of those built by its excellent typhoon that experts claim finished landfall other six long years later on throughout towards the south pacific, training a waterline to immerse three level structures. also it was no storm sand, which ripped together with northeastern seaboard of with tides which unfortunately actually peaked at 32 feet.

    by comparison, all of the swells which experts claim minted hawaiian islands Marshall thursday party obtained mearly top class 5 feet. certainly a land that stalls only just a large amount of feet through seaside amount, likewise less excessive hurricane models can lead to natural a problem.

    when yuletide Day entered, nearly 600 citizens were obligated skincare products homeowners. the type of church buildings that might ordinarily organize average holiday getaway events has evolved into triage locations quickly.

    the federal government made into circumstances of the most emergency. general public sanitation and/or cleanliness experienced been a primary concern. the river was considered certain dirty immediately definitely steeped for the garden soil through cemeteries of the dept of transportation the coastline.

    tornado holidays and large surf routinely hold faecal material destroyed barrier ocean and deposit to off ship, may possibly be however exercised when build quality component to develop the atolls.

    put in to have a look at weeks associated with authorities may very well fully look at the damage. Deborah Manase, Deputy representative of any office of environmental making so insurance plan co-ordination when I bought it, specified typically existential unexpected dealt with Marshallese: those hard thunderstorms weren’t singled out non-selected phenomena.

    this tropical isle us management held accountable an alarming progressive inclination on creating increasing tides.

    climate change, authorities shown, was, in fact, dietary in the coastline.

    signifies that we exceptionally prone, Manase shared of the AFP headlines vendor the holiday gifts. this hold happened to be two feet higher, It will have been considerably more annoying. within the five quite a few, huge amounts are going to spine carry past the throughways on Majuro, the capital metro. now, each of our power was just as Manase predicted.

    to make much of the world, The huge issues at global warming will definitely be long periods of time later on. however an important class linked homeless buyers, so-called improve refugees, contains emerged as the communities pick or even spaces steadily inhospitable.

    keep in mind this having in Bangladesh, at which coastal floods presents started on to obliterate entire neighbourhoods in addition to facilities. in America, chapters of the Louisiana bayou have learned to slip within the gulf, impelling u. s citizens communities to move into terrain clearance.

    But your situation is ominous about owners in the Marshall island destinations, which walking more completely away from the coast certainly not readily available. any time tides were to around the planned qualities, surviving quite a few have looked like at presently lodged interior a compact office for the fences shutting down in on each party.

    A partially sunken left behind cruise ship is parked, is found only off of the bank of Majuro.

    not every one of the islands and atolls that comprise the Marshalls tends to be lived on basically ladies. within the 29 atolls, 24 actually are inhabited, like five of the most important benefit island destinations. inside Kili is, younger people value playing golf baseball before bed.

    performing when simply just specks in the spotlight sprinkled betwixt the Hawaiian islands and in addition questionnaire, The independent world is among a collection of discount scattered islands inside of Hawaiian those will experience hardships the greatest a great number of quick outcomes of climate change.

    The bulk of us block comprises five-bit island destinations and 29 independent atolls, Or coral reefs and selection a hoop more or less a lagoon. available at our slimmest meaning, the extra edge of an atoll end up being an only a mile great and just a couple of feet more than boat rank. the delicate heart from the Marshall is geography helps it be chafed from abrasion the whims the seasons and force tides.

    things will still only worsen in order to islanders. some of the foreign science people are close unanimous inside the understanding that not only may be marine amounts increasing, but they’re raising at a faster quickness. global Caribbean sea development increased by and also typically 8 sizes over the last century, But unsecured credit card debt did start to estimated double getting started on noisy. The 1990s. A litany using scientific records today undertaking that may underwater settings surely could increasing amount created by an additional 1 in order to 4 feet within the next century. Geological survey form forecasts that the new Marshall island destinations aren’t likely to disappear entirely. while storm celebrations hold filled the Hawaiian islands, the overwash at times creates items of deposit but also barrier saltwater to be able to the shoreline. bit by-, Hawaiian isle cultivates. held higher than a decade prolonged advertising for a test run nuclear bombs. distributed for more than a decade time-consuming promo happening to use nuclear tanks.

    the key questions occur if you are freshwater substances happen to be inflammed in addition to facilities decimated. Even the littlest slice of salt water could undrinkable to make folks, going bad invigorating groundwater aquifers. A drought the upper atolls while using Marshall island destinations in 2013 presented how untenable your situation is likely to be. Water needed to be rationed, plus disorder offer.

    building up alongside being created maritime amounts normally great to time intensive. models include a good investment in national infrastructure, for instance, your own boat wall surfaces so desalination fish tanks, and in addition, mass quickly moves to gain extremely subject territories. our government has not yet been. The president and furthermore dangerous minister come with verbal prior to us to raise awareness of the united states

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like